Search for: All records

From the United States’ Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) to the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), there has been an increased focus on individual data privacy protection. Because multiple enforcement agencies (such as legal entities and external governing bodies) have jurisdiction over data governance, it is possible for the same data value to be subject to multiple (and potentially conflicting) policies. As a result, managing and enforcing all applicable legal requirements has become a complex task. In this paper, we present a comprehensive overview of the steps to integrating data retention and purging into a database management system (DBMS). We describe the changes necessary at each step of the data lifecycle management, the minimum functionality that any DBMS (relational or NoSQL) must support, and the guarantees provided by this system. Our proposed solution is 1) completely transparent from the perspective of the DBMS user; 2) requires only a minimal amount of tuning by the database administrator; 3) imposes a negligible performance overhead and a modest storage overhead; and 4) automates the enforcement of both retention and purging policies in the database. 

Data privacy requirements are a complex and quickly evolving part of the data management domain. Especially in Healthcare (e.g., United States Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and Veterans Affairs requirements), there has been a strong emphasis on data privacy and protection. Data storage is governed by multiple sources of policy requirements, including internal policies and legal requirements imposed by external governing organizations. Within a database, a single value can be subject to multiple requirements on how long it must be preserved and when it must be irrecoverably destroyed. This often results in a complex set of overlapping and potentially conflicting policies. Existing storage systems are lacking sufficient support functionality for these critical and evolving rules, making compliance an underdeveloped aspect of data management. As a result, many organizations must implement manual ad-hoc solutions to ensure compliance. As long as organizations depend on manual approaches, there is an increased risk of non-compliance and threat to customer data privacy. In this paper, we detail and implement an automated comprehensive data management compliance framework facilitating retention and purging compliance within a database management system. This framework can be integrated into existing databases without requiring changes to existing business processes. Our proposed implementation uses SQL to set policies and automate compliance. We validate this framework on a Postgres database, and measure the factors that contribute to our reasonable performance overhead (13% in a simulated real-world workload). 

Data compliance laws establish rules intended to protect privacy. These define both retention durations (how long data must be kept) and purging deadlines (when the data must be destroyed in storage). To comply with the laws and to minimize liability, companies must destroy data that must be purged or is no longer needed. However, database backups generally cannot be edited to purge ``expired'' data and erasing the entire backup is impractical. To maintain compliance, data curators need a mechanism to support targeted destruction of data in backups. In this paper, we present a cryptographic erasure framework that can purge data from across database backups. We demonstrate how different purge policies can be defined through views and enforced without violating database constraints. 

Compliance with data retention laws and legislation is an important aspect of data management. As new laws governing personal data management are introduced (e.g., California Consumer Privacy Act enacted in 2020) and a greater emphasis is placed on enforcing data privacy law compliance, data retention support must be an inherent part of data management systems. However, relational databases do not currently offer functionality to enforce retention compliance. In this paper, we propose a framework that integrates data retention support into any relational database. Using SQL-based mechanisms, our system supports an intuitive definition of data retention policies. We demonstrate that our approach meets the legal requirements of retention and can be implemented to transparently guarantee compliance. Our framework streamlines compliance support without requiring database schema changes, while incurring an average 6.7% overhead compared to the current state-of-the-art solution. 

Data retention laws establish rules intended to protect privacy. These define both retention durations (how long data must be kept) and purging deadlines (when the data must be destroyed in storage). To comply with the laws and to minimize liability, companies should destroy data that must be purged or is no longer needed. However, database backups generally cannot be edited to purge “expired” data and erasing the entire backup is impractical. To maintain compliance, data curators need a mechanism to support targeted destruction of data in backups. In this paper, we present a cryptographic erasure framework that can purge data from all database backups. Our approach can be transparently integrated into existing database backup processes. We demonstrate how different purge policies can be defined through views and enforced by triggers without violating database constraints. 

Best practices in data management and privacy mandate that old data must be irreversibly destroyed. However, due to performance optimization reasons, old (deleted or updated) data is not immediately purged from active database storage. Database backups that typically work by backing up table and index pages (rather than logical rows) greatly exacerbate the privacy problem of the old surviving data. Copying such deleted data into backups ensures that unknown quantities of old data can be stored indefinitely. In this paper, we quantify the amount of deleted data retained in backups by four major representative databases, comparing the default behavior versus an explicit defrag operation. We review the defrag options available in these databases and discuss the impact they have on eliminating old data from backups. We demonstrate that each database has a defrag mechanism that can eliminate most of old deleted data (although in Oracle pre-update content may survive defrag). Finally, we outline the factors that organizations should consider when deciding whether to apply defrag prior to executing their backups. 

Security investigations often rely on forensic tools to deliver the necessary supporting evidence. It is therefore imperative that forensic tools are scientifically tested in both their accuracy and capabilities. The primary means to develop and validate forensic tools is by evaluating them against a set of known answers (i.e., a data corpus). While researchers have long recognized the need for standardized forensic corpora, there are few such tools or datasets available, particularly for database management systems (DBMS). In fact, there are currently no publicly available tools that can generate a DBMS dataset for forensic testing. In this paper, we share SysGen, a customizeable data generator and a pre-built corpus that offers a reference for most major relational DBMSes. The pre-built corpus includes individual DBMS files, the full disk snapshot, the RAM snapshot, and network packets taken from a set of clean virtual machines. SysGen can be easily adapted to execute a custom workload scenario, capturing a new data corpus; it can also create other variations of full system snapshots, even beyond DBMS testing.